Brasilia

I visited the Brazilian seat of government over the summer and spent two days with my eye behind my camera desperately trying to document as many of the landmark buildings that I could. I got up early both days and walked until it was mid-evening, still taking pictures when it was dark.

 

My entire reason for visiting the city was to see the buildings. I was a dedicated tourist following a map and guide book faithfully. The act of taking a picture of something ingrains that framed view into your memory so that on reviewing the images the other memories seem to fade in comparison, and only those recorded on your camera are left. What remains is a mediated experience of the city where the truth is distorted by various mechanisms.

I had seen images of the architecture of the city all around the country, most notably in a Niemeyer exhibition in Sao Paulo, but also at the bus terminals on adverts for destinations. Interestingly though, other cities like Belo Horizonte and Niteroi near Rio presented themselves more emphatically as architectural destinations leaving Brasilia as the more sedate enigmatic capital that lay deep in Brazil’s interior. The image of the city was used as a brand for the country though, where silhouettes of the architecture were adopted for company logos and t-shirts.

brasnarrative.jpg

 

 

As an attempt to distill my experience I have constructed a narrative which is as much the diary of a flanuer as it is trying to be Tschumi’s Manhattan Transcripts. It is my record of the city which was combined with a mapping exercise. To see the full image visit my blog:

www.petemcmahon.wordpress.com

 

 



Have your say

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>




Safari hates me

About

Studio Six, MArch School of Architecture,

University of Sheffield

The work of  Studio Six is linked to the Interdependence Day project, (www.interdependenceday.co.uk)

launched in 2006 to reinvigorate sustainability debates and to question some of the technocratic outcomes of seeing ecological and economic concerns as an accounting or ‘problem solving’ challenge.

What can architecture contribute to this attempt to reconsider global, economic and environmental issues?

Interdependent understanding invites an architecture rooted in creativity and metaphor, which ‘listens’ to the potential of a city rather than imposing mark marketable criteria of enterprise, lifestyle or efficiency. This architecture is based on conversations between the city and its varied inhabitants, and in an awareness of its social, economic and ecological metabolism.

The interdependencies of a place may be understood as a particularly dynamic and complex constellation of social, economic and emotional relations, but the term also has ambitions for a sense of a place that is extroverted and unexpected. Interdependence includes a consciousness of links with the wider world integrating in a positive way the near and far, the local and the global, the human and the ecological.

The studio will instigate alternative modes of architectural collaboration, representation, and communication that are more open and amateur rather than specialised or expert. We will be exploring an architecture of ‘making-do’ and of ‘provisional construction’.

The studio has been exploring the ’steel cities’ of Nowa Huta and Sheffield but we have also been thinking about other cities, about state responsibility, about carnival, about pigeons…     Renata Tyszczuk